Skip to Main Content

The University of Tennessee

UT/Institute for Public Service



Wednesday, April 16, 2014

You can’t take anyone farther than you’ve taken yourself.

 You can’t take anyone farther than you’ve taken yourself - interesting statement I read in a recent article about another Baldrige award winner.  They say, "Assessing our processes, systems, and results against the Baldrige Criteria and Baldrige-worthy organizations continually sharpens our saw."

This is a service-based organization that has purposed to change its culture. They believe, "The history of successful organizational improvement journeys proves the need for organizational alignment, from the board to the front line. We believe these three key accelerants to alignment are vital prior to starting successful partnerships: (1) highest-ranking officers who are personally committed to steering the journey, (2) senior executives who hold leaders accountable for metric-based performance outcomes through a performance management and evaluation system, and (3) senior teams who provide their leaders with the skills needed to maximize their own potential by providing mandatory, quarterly leadership training."

Read the entire article here:

http://nistbaldrige.blogs.govdelivery.com/2014/03/27/changing-culture-insights-from-a-2010-baldrige-award-winner/

The pursuit of excellence is hard work. It takes time and dedication. We want all the organizations we work with to perform at their best, so we should want no less for our own organization. Thoughts?

Monday, April 14, 2014

Why Baldrige?


At a recent Baldrige conference one of the Excellence Award winners from an educational institution in Wisconsin answered the question - why did she choose to use Baldrige for her organization?

Here's text from her presentation:

She offered these answers to the question, Why Baldrige?

· “Because before we used [the Baldrige Criteria], we were hard-working, but now we’re more effective and efficient.”

· “Because [Baldrige] allowed us to leverage our strength in planning and get better to reach new heights of achievement.”

· “Because [Baldrige] allows us to make sure that we are using results to drive improvement.”

· “Because by using a systematic approach, we became more innovative.”

Any organization should aspire to be efficient, effective, improvement focused and innovative. I sure want IPS to be that type of organization!

Tuesday, April 8, 2014

Four Reasons to Quit Your Job

I follow Jack Welch's Leadership Blog on LinkedIn. Most posts are interesting, but every now and then one comes along that really hits home. The IPS Senior Leadership Team is committed to making IPS an "Employer of Choice."  That means we want employees who really want to work here, employees who believe in our mission, employees who are achieving their personal and professional goals.

Read Jack's insight and ask yourself these four questions.

Four Reasons to Quit Your Job

What criteria can you use to determine if you have been with the same company too long?
 
A friend of ours, an investment manager at a highly regarded company in the Midwest, who drove to work one morning, parked his car in the usual spot, and then found he simply could not bring himself to get out of the car. “I guess I stayed on the farm one day too long,” he joked later. When we asked him what went wrong, he answered, “It wasn’t one thing. It was everything.” No wonder he drove home and called in his resignation.
 
Obviously, most people don’t decide they’ve overstayed at their companies in such a dramatic fashion. Usually, angst about work creeps in, and then builds until it consumes you. And that can happen early or late in a career. Gone are the days when, after graduation, you took the best available job and stayed for as many years as you could possibly stand, frustration be damned. These days, it is not unusual to hear of perfectly legitimate careers built on multiple job stints.
 
So, to your question, how can you tell when it’s time to move on? We wouldn’t set out specific criteria as much as offer four questions to help sort out an answer.
 
The first is so simple it almost goes without saying, but the fact that a lot of people don’t confront it, including our friend who ended up stuck in his car—a Harvard MBA, by the way—suggests we should go ahead and put it out there: Do you want to go to work every morning?
This is not a matter to be over-brained. Does the prospect of going in each day excite you or fill you with dread? Does the work feel interesting and meaningful or are you just going through motions to pull a paycheck? Are you still learning and growing?
 
We know of a woman who worked in consulting for seven years. She loved her firm and had originally planned a career with it, but suddenly started noticing that she wished every weekend was five days long. “Basically, I felt like we were putting together massive books in order to make recommendations to people who knew more than we did,” she said. “Every day at the office, I felt a little bit more of a hypocrite.” She now happily works on the “front lines,” to use her phrase, in the marketing department of a retail company.
 
Second, do you enjoy spending time with your coworkers or do they generally bug the living daylights out of you? We’re not saying you should only stay at your company if you want to barbecue with your team every weekend, but if you don’t sincerely enjoy and respect the people you spend 10 hours a day with, you can be sure you will eventually decide to leave your organization. Why not make the break sooner rather than later and start cultivating relationships at a company where you might actually plant roots?
 
Third, does your company help you fulfill your personal mission? Essentially, this question asks whether your company jibes with your life’s goals and values. Does it require you, for instance, to travel more than you’d like, given your chosen work-life balance? Does it offer enough upward mobility, given your level of ambition? There are no right or wrong answers to such questions, only a sense of whether you are investing your time at the right or wrong company for you.
 
Fourth and finally, can you picture yourself at your company in a year? We use that time frame because that’s how long it usually takes to find a new, better job once you decide to move on. So peer, as best you can, into the future, and predict where you’ll be in the organization, what work you’ll be doing, whom you will be managing, and who will be managing you. If that scenario strikes you with anything short of excitement, then you’re spinning your wheels. Or put another way, you’re just about to stay too long.
 
To be clear: We’re not suggesting people quit at the first inkling of discontent. No matter where you work, at some point you will have to endure difficult times, and even a deadly dull assignment, to survive a crisis or move up. But it makes little sense to stay and stay at a company because of inertia. Unlock your door and get out.
 
Jack Welch is Executive Chairman of the Jack Welch Management Institute at Strayer University. Through its Executive MBA program, the Jack Welch Management Institute provides students and organizations with the proven methodologies, immediately actionable practices, and respected credentials needed to win in business.

Suzy Welch is a best-selling author, popular television commentator, and noted business journalist. Her New York Times bestselling book, 10-10-10: A Life Transforming Idea, presents a powerful decision-making strategy for success at work and in parenting, love and friendship. Together with her husband Jack Welch, Suzy is also co-author of the #1 international bestsellerWinning, and its companion volume, Winning: The Answers. Since 2005, they have written business columns for several publications, including Business Week magazine, Thomson Reuters digital platforms, Fortune magazine, and the New York Times syndicate.

A version of this column originally appeared in BusinessWeek Magazine.

Wednesday, March 26, 2014

Guest Blog from Keith Groves


What style are you?

I have been for the last year and a half been involved in the Leadership Academy at IPS.  We have been exposed to some interesting concepts and styles.  One of my assignments is to construct a blog on the topic of choice. 

Currently, I am co facilitating a class on leadership within the manufacturing world called Toyota KATA, the management style of Toyota Motor Company.  What is unique about this KATA style of management is the deliberate pattern by which continuous improvement takes place with the shop floor.  Kiichiro Toyota, founder of Toyota Motor Company, learned from his father that he must seek to improve every day.  This process is not conducted in a vacuum in a classroom, but on the floor where the work is going on.  Toyota’s method was to not give the worker the answer, but to challenge them to discover for themselves the right way to improve processes and learn from the experiences during the discovery process.

So in my journey with the Leadership Academy, we studied an American President Abraham Lincoln, who also had a very distinct style of leadership.  It has been reported that Lincoln spent very little time, during the US conflict, in his office at the Whitehouse.  Lincoln was very involved with his leaders about how the war was going and how progress was being made.  He spent many hours with Generals and others learning strategy and next steps.  His goal was a resolution to the conflict.  He didn’t have all the answers or maybe didn’t even know all the questions but he challenged his officers to develop plans to meet this objective.  Manage by walking around, is how Lincoln’s management style has been described.

As I began to put together these two philosophy patterns, I began to realize that these leaders, one changed the course of auto manufacturing worldwide and one changed the course of our Nation, but both had a very similar style.  These two men lead by the vision they had for their respected entities and the outcome they desired, Lincoln, peace for his beloved Country and Toyota, success for a highly respected auto manufacturer, who began his career making weaving looms. 

What I believe we can take away from this is, we don’t always have to have all the answers before we impart on a journey.  We do have to have a vision of where we want to go and trust those that we depend on to get us there.  Our job as Leaders is to draw the creativity of our co-workers and guide them in paths that lead to that desired outcome.  Give them the satisfaction and help them feel their worth in what they are doing as we travel together down the path of discovery. 

Our mission should define our outcome and everything we do, every lesson we learn should focus on that mission.

Monday, March 24, 2014

So Many Leaders Get This Wrong

I don't agree with all that Jack Welch has to say on leadership, but this article caught my eye. We've got to work harder at IPS and at UT to get HR "right." What do you think about Jack's theory on HR? What can we do to improve?

 

So Many Leaders Get This Wrong

By Jack and Suzy Welch
We've always said that human resources should be the most powerful part of an organization. So why, in reality, is its impact more often felt in a negative way?

Because human resources, unfortunately, often operates as a cloak-and-dagger society or a health-and-happiness sideshow. Those are extremes, of course, but if there is anything we have learned over the past five years of traveling and talking to business groups, it is that HR rarely functions as it should. That’s an outrage, made only more frustrating by the fact that most leaders aren’t scrambling to fix it.

Look, HR should be every company’s “killer app.” What could possibly be more important than who gets hired, developed, promoted, or moved out the door? Business is a game, and as with all games, the team that puts the best people on the field and gets them playing together wins. It’s that simple.

You would never know it, though, to look at the companies today where the CFO reigns supreme and HR is relegated to the background. It just doesn’t make sense. If you owned the Boston Red Sox, for instance, would you hang around with the team accountant or the director of player personnel?

Sure, the accountant can tell you the financials. But the director of player personnel knows what it takes to win: how good each player is and where to find strong recruits to fill talent gaps. Several years ago we spoke to 5,000 HR professionals in Mexico City. At one point we asked the audience: “How many of you work at companies where the leader gives HR a seat at the table equal to that of the CFO?” After an awkward silence, fewer than 50 people raised their hands. Awful!

Since then, we have tried to understand why HR has become so marginalized. As noted above, there are at least two extremes of bad behavior.
The stealthy stuff occurs when HR managers become little kingmakers, making and breaking careers, sometimes not even at the leader’s behest. These HR departments can indeed be powerful, but often in a detrimental way, prompting the best people to leave just to get away from the palace intrigue.
Almost as often, though, you get the other extreme: HR departments that plan picnics, put out the plant newsletter (complete with time-in-service anniversaries duly noted), and generally drive everyone crazy by enforcing rules and regulations that appear to have no purpose other than to bolster the bureaucracy. They derive the little power they have by being cloyingly benevolent on one hand and company scolds on the other.

So how do leaders fix this mess? It all starts with the people they appoint to run HR—not kingmakers or cops but big leaguers, men and women with real stature and credibility. In fact, managers need to fill HR with a special kind of hybrid: people who are part pastor (hearing all sins and complaints without recrimination) and part parent (loving and nurturing, but giving it to you straight when you’re off track).

Pastor-Parent types can come up through the HR department, but more often than not, they have run something during their careers, such as a factory or a function. They get the business—its inner workings, history, tensions, and the hidden hierarchies that exist in people’s minds. They are known to be relentlessly candid, even when the message is hard, and they hold confidences tight. With their insight and integrity, pastor-parents earn the trust of the organization.

But pastor-parents don’t just sit around making people feel warm and fuzzy. They improve the company by overseeing a rigorous appraisal-and-evaluation system that lets every person know where he or she stands, and they monitor that system with the same intensity as a Sarbanes-Oxley compliance officer.

Leaders must also make sure that human resources fulfills two other roles. It should create effective mechanisms, such as money, recognition, and training, to motivate and retain people. And it should force organizations to confront their most charged relationships, such as those with unions, individuals who are no longer delivering results, or stars who are becoming problematic by, for instance, swelling instead of growing.

Now, considering your negative experience with human resources—and you are hardly alone—this kind of high-impact HR activity probably sounds like a pipe dream. But given the fact that most leaders loudly proclaim that people are their “biggest asset,” it shouldn’t be.

It can’t be. Leaders need to put their money where their mouth is and get HR to do its real job: elevating employee management to the same level of professionalism and integrity as financial management. Since people are the whole game, what could be more important?

Jack Welch is Executive Chairman of the Jack Welch Management Institute at Strayer University. Through its Executive MBA program, the Jack Welch Management Institute provides students and organizations with the proven methodologies, immediately actionable practices, and respected credentials needed to win in business.

Suzy Welch is a best-selling author, popular television commentator, and noted business journalist. Her New York Times bestselling book, 10-10-10: A Life Transforming Idea, presents a powerful decision-making strategy for success at work and in parenting, love and friendship. Together with her husband Jack Welch, Suzy is also co-author of the #1 international bestseller Winning, and its companion volume, Winning: The Answers. Since 2005, they have written business columns for several publications, including Business Week magazine, Thomson Reuters digital platforms, Fortune magazine, and the New York Times syndicate.

A version of this column originally appeared in BusinessWeek Magazine.

Monday, February 24, 2014

Strategy Implementation

As we continue to work on the initiatives developed during our strategic planning process, we will use the strategy implementation teams that were formed several years ago. Each customer-focused team is lead by a member of the senior leadership team and includes representatives from each agency.  In addition, a member of the advocacy team and a member of the IT team serve as liaisons to each strategy team, if support from either of these teams is required on a particular project.

To fully integrate our process, each goal in the IPS strategic plan is linked to one of the UT System strategic goals as well as one of the Baldrige criteria. Nearly 60 individuals are involved in one or more of these teams. (See the team list below)

As we complete our APR process this year, one of the goals is to clearly link the work plan of each staff member to the work plan of his/her agency. If we accomplish this, then each individual should see a clear path between his/her work and the success of the University of Tennessee!

I look forward to hearing about the continuing work of our Implementation Teams this year. Visit the IPS SharePoint site to see team reports, meeting schedules and work plans.

https://utworks.tennessee.edu/ips/SIT/SitePages/Home.aspx

IPS Strategy Implementation Teams
2/3/2014
TEAMS Team Leader Central Office CIS CTAS LEIC Naifeh Center MTAS IPS Strategic Goal UT Strategic Goal Baldrige Category IT Liaison Advocacy Liaison
CUSTOMER FOCUSED                        
Promote Good Government Thomas Thompson Hagan-Dier Hayes Kelley Peevely Cross, Neill 1 3 3 Shipley Ketelle
      Idol/Lane Roberts   Mundy Wolf          
Strengthen Economic Vitality Jennings Thompson Phillips Spears, M. N/A N/A Nevad, Deem 2 3 3 Erdmann Phillips
      Ketelle Phillips     Wibking          
Build Individual/Organizational Capacity Garland Thompson Kelly Kinloch Ungurait Mundy Barton, Wyatt 3 3 3 Gordy Thomas
      Ridley Moon   Peevely Ely          
                         
ORGANIZATIONAL EXCELLENCE                        
Measurement/Results Green Shoopman Cooper-Duru Meyers Miller Peevely J. Jones, Major 4 4 4/7 Gordy Gossett
        Moon   Mundy Shipley          
Workforce Development Martin Shoopman Eddy McCroskey Smith N/A B. Jones 4 4 5 Gordy Robertson
      Ridley Kinloch   Frederick          
Operations White Shoopman DePriest Johnson Miller N/A Whitehead 4 4 6 Walden Stooksbury
      Eddy Roberts     Wolfe, Smeltzer          
                       
Leadership/Strategic Planning Jinks Shoopman Jennings Garland Green Peevely Thomas All 4 1/2 Gordy Robertson
    Thompson                    
Roles and Responsibilities
The two assistant vice presidents will oversee the two major  groups (customer focused and organizational focused)
The remaining members of the IPS leadership team will serve as team leaders
Agencies will have two or three members per team, depending on the topic.
IT and Advocacy will support all the teams.  They will have separate team meetings as necessary and will have a liaison to each strategy team who will meet with the team at the call of the team leader.
Each team should post meeting dates and times on the Outlook calendar so that the meetings are open to anyone interesed in attending.
Each team should post team minutes to the SharePoint site so any employee can keep up with team progress.
These two teams are internal support teams who do not have their own agenda, but rather support the work of the other teams. They will not be required to provide "strategy team reports."
IT Team (UTSA Communities of Practice and other IT initiatives) Gordy Gordy Erdmann Walden Gordy Gordy Shipley
Advocacy Team (UTSA Goal 5) Robertson Stooksbury Ketelle, Phillips Gossett Robertson Robertson Thomas

Border Photo

Institute for Public Service
105 Student Services Building
Knoxville, TN 37996
Phone: (865) 974-6621