Skip to Main Content

The University of Tennessee

UT/Institute for Public Service



Showing posts with label Employee Engagement. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Employee Engagement. Show all posts

Monday, March 24, 2014

So Many Leaders Get This Wrong

I don't agree with all that Jack Welch has to say on leadership, but this article caught my eye. We've got to work harder at IPS and at UT to get HR "right." What do you think about Jack's theory on HR? What can we do to improve?

 

So Many Leaders Get This Wrong

By Jack and Suzy Welch
We've always said that human resources should be the most powerful part of an organization. So why, in reality, is its impact more often felt in a negative way?

Because human resources, unfortunately, often operates as a cloak-and-dagger society or a health-and-happiness sideshow. Those are extremes, of course, but if there is anything we have learned over the past five years of traveling and talking to business groups, it is that HR rarely functions as it should. That’s an outrage, made only more frustrating by the fact that most leaders aren’t scrambling to fix it.

Look, HR should be every company’s “killer app.” What could possibly be more important than who gets hired, developed, promoted, or moved out the door? Business is a game, and as with all games, the team that puts the best people on the field and gets them playing together wins. It’s that simple.

You would never know it, though, to look at the companies today where the CFO reigns supreme and HR is relegated to the background. It just doesn’t make sense. If you owned the Boston Red Sox, for instance, would you hang around with the team accountant or the director of player personnel?

Sure, the accountant can tell you the financials. But the director of player personnel knows what it takes to win: how good each player is and where to find strong recruits to fill talent gaps. Several years ago we spoke to 5,000 HR professionals in Mexico City. At one point we asked the audience: “How many of you work at companies where the leader gives HR a seat at the table equal to that of the CFO?” After an awkward silence, fewer than 50 people raised their hands. Awful!

Since then, we have tried to understand why HR has become so marginalized. As noted above, there are at least two extremes of bad behavior.
The stealthy stuff occurs when HR managers become little kingmakers, making and breaking careers, sometimes not even at the leader’s behest. These HR departments can indeed be powerful, but often in a detrimental way, prompting the best people to leave just to get away from the palace intrigue.
Almost as often, though, you get the other extreme: HR departments that plan picnics, put out the plant newsletter (complete with time-in-service anniversaries duly noted), and generally drive everyone crazy by enforcing rules and regulations that appear to have no purpose other than to bolster the bureaucracy. They derive the little power they have by being cloyingly benevolent on one hand and company scolds on the other.

So how do leaders fix this mess? It all starts with the people they appoint to run HR—not kingmakers or cops but big leaguers, men and women with real stature and credibility. In fact, managers need to fill HR with a special kind of hybrid: people who are part pastor (hearing all sins and complaints without recrimination) and part parent (loving and nurturing, but giving it to you straight when you’re off track).

Pastor-Parent types can come up through the HR department, but more often than not, they have run something during their careers, such as a factory or a function. They get the business—its inner workings, history, tensions, and the hidden hierarchies that exist in people’s minds. They are known to be relentlessly candid, even when the message is hard, and they hold confidences tight. With their insight and integrity, pastor-parents earn the trust of the organization.

But pastor-parents don’t just sit around making people feel warm and fuzzy. They improve the company by overseeing a rigorous appraisal-and-evaluation system that lets every person know where he or she stands, and they monitor that system with the same intensity as a Sarbanes-Oxley compliance officer.

Leaders must also make sure that human resources fulfills two other roles. It should create effective mechanisms, such as money, recognition, and training, to motivate and retain people. And it should force organizations to confront their most charged relationships, such as those with unions, individuals who are no longer delivering results, or stars who are becoming problematic by, for instance, swelling instead of growing.

Now, considering your negative experience with human resources—and you are hardly alone—this kind of high-impact HR activity probably sounds like a pipe dream. But given the fact that most leaders loudly proclaim that people are their “biggest asset,” it shouldn’t be.

It can’t be. Leaders need to put their money where their mouth is and get HR to do its real job: elevating employee management to the same level of professionalism and integrity as financial management. Since people are the whole game, what could be more important?

Jack Welch is Executive Chairman of the Jack Welch Management Institute at Strayer University. Through its Executive MBA program, the Jack Welch Management Institute provides students and organizations with the proven methodologies, immediately actionable practices, and respected credentials needed to win in business.

Suzy Welch is a best-selling author, popular television commentator, and noted business journalist. Her New York Times bestselling book, 10-10-10: A Life Transforming Idea, presents a powerful decision-making strategy for success at work and in parenting, love and friendship. Together with her husband Jack Welch, Suzy is also co-author of the #1 international bestseller Winning, and its companion volume, Winning: The Answers. Since 2005, they have written business columns for several publications, including Business Week magazine, Thomson Reuters digital platforms, Fortune magazine, and the New York Times syndicate.

A version of this column originally appeared in BusinessWeek Magazine.

Monday, September 9, 2013

Employee Survey - UT Custom Statements

This is one of a series of blogs related to our recent Employee Satisfaction Survey results.

In the category of UT Custom Statements the overall improvement was 2 points. And, there are no Honor Roll scores since these statements are unique to UT.








Friday, September 6, 2013

Employee Survey - Respect & Appreciation

This is one of a series of blogs related to our recent Employee Satisfaction Survey results.

In the category of Respect and Appreciation the overall improvement was 1 point. And, IPS is 31 points off the Honor Roll.






Thursday, September 5, 2013

Employee Survey - Fairness

This is one of a series of blogs related to our recent Employee Satisfaction Survey results.

In the category of Fairness the overall improvement was 5 points. And, IPS is 48 points off the Honor Roll.







Wednesday, September 4, 2013

Employee Survey - Collaboration

This is one of a series of blogs related to our recent Employee Satisfaction Survey results.

In the category of Collaboration the overall improvement was 7 points. And, IPS is 48 points off the Honor Roll.



 
 
 

Tuesday, September 3, 2013

Employee Survey - Communication

This is one of a series of blogs related to our recent Employee Satisfaction Survey results.

In the category of Communication the overall improvement was 5 points. And, IPS is 51 points off the Honor Roll.







Friday, August 30, 2013

Employee Survey - Adminstration and Staff Relations


This is one of a series of blogs related to our recent Employee Satisfaction Survey results.

In the category of Administration and Staff Relations the overall improvement was 14 points. And, IPS is 37 points off the Honor Roll.






Thursday, August 29, 2013

Employee Survey - Senior Leadership


This is one of a series of blogs related to our recent Employee Satisfaction Survey results.

In the category of Senior Leadership the overall improvement was 6 points. And, IPS is 56 points off the Honor Roll.










Wednesday, August 28, 2013

Employee Survey - Supervisors


This is one of a series of blogs related to our recent Employee Satisfaction Survey results.

In the category of Supervisors the overall improvement was 14 points. And, IPS is 23 points off the Honor Roll.




 
 
 
 

Tuesday, August 27, 2013

Employee Survey - Pride


This is one of a series of blogs related to our recent Employee Satisfaction Survey results.

In the category of Pride the overall improvement was 11 points. And, IPS is 20 points off the Honor Roll.






Monday, August 26, 2013

Employee Survey - Shared Governance


This is one of a series of blogs related to our recent Employee Satisfaction Survey results.

In the category of Shared Governance the overall improvement was 17 points. And, IPS is 47 points off the Honor Roll.





 

Friday, August 23, 2013

Employee Survey - Policies, Resources and Efficiency


This is one of a series of blogs related to our recent Employee Satisfaction Survey results.

In the category of Policies, Resources and Efficiency there was an overall decline of 3 points. And, IPS is 38 points off the Honor Roll. This is the only category where IPS overall scores declined.










Thursday, August 22, 2013

Employee Survey - Facilities


This is one of a series of blogs related to our recent Employee Satisfaction Survey results.

In the category of Facilities the overall improvement was 6 points. And, IPS is on the Honor Roll in this category.






Wednesday, August 21, 2013

Employee Survey - Compensation, Benefits and Work/life Balance


This is one of a series of blogs related to our recent Employee Satisfaction Survey results.

In the category of Compensations, Benefits and Work/Life Balance the overall improvement was 11 points. And, IPS is 7 points off the Honor Roll.







Tuesday, August 20, 2013

Employee Survey - Professional Development

This is one of a series of blogs related to our recent Employee Satisfaction Survey results.

In the category of Professional Development the overall improvement was 1 point. And, IPS is 28 points off the Honor Roll.












Monday, August 19, 2013

Employee Survey - Job Satisfaction

This is one of a series of blogs related to our recent Employee Satisfaction Survey results.

In the category of Job Satisfaction and Support the overall improvement was 10 points. And, IPS is 11 points off the Honor Roll. Improvement is calculated by adding the change in positive scores to the change in negative scores for a total improvement or decline change. In this example, positive scores improved by 9 points and negative scores improved by 1 point for a total improvement of 10 points.










Friday, August 16, 2013

Employee Engagement Survey Results

Rich Boyer did a nice job of providing a quick overview of the IPS Employee Engagement Survey results at the Annual Conference break-out session. In order to give staff more time to study the data, I am posting a category each day over the next two weeks so that you can see the 2011 results compared to the 2013 results.

According to Modern Think's analysis, positive scores of 75% or more and negative scores of less than 10% are excellent scores. Likewise, positive scores of less than 45% and negative scores of more than 19% are red flag areas. The same scale is used to code the scores throughout the survey results.

Those questions specifically related to agencies will be addressed at the individual agency level. I have already met with the management teams and I am expecting a plan from them in September.

Those questions that are overall IPS related will be addressed in a variety of formats in the coming months.  Strategy teams, Baldrige Teams and the Leadership Academy all will be studying the results. More to come on specific plans.  For now, here are the overall results.






Tuesday, July 2, 2013

Happenings Across the Institute

About 50% of IPS staff attended one of the recent statewide staff meetings. This is a summary of the discussion points with a few additional tidbits of information that have developed since the meetings finished.


Outreach and Engagement Model – This is an initiative of the UT System Strategic Plan, Goal Three on Outreach and Engagement. Each campus and institute is developing a one-page model that describes how we "do" outreach and engagement. IPS staff can check-out our latest draft at http://intranet.ips.tennessee.edu/
 
The Horizon Project –  What are the big, compelling problems that IPS might attempt to address in five to ten years?  This effort is taking us through a process where we are taking a big-picture view and then getting significant feedback from staff and stakeholders. Crime, Education, Leadership, Social Responsibility and Local Government Finance are all currently being considered.

Baldrige teams and Strategy Implementation Teams – Baldrige Teams are short-term teams that are focused on updating our Baldrige applications that will be submitted next summer. We are applying for the Tennessee Center for Performance Excellence Level Three Recognition as part of our "accreditation" process. Strategy teams are long-term teams that are focused on initiatives of our strategic plan.

Budget update – Our budget information is on the Intranet at http://intranet.ips.tennessee.edu/2010_budget.asp.  Overall we are going into a good budget year with a 2.5% increase in base funding, 1.5% salary pool, and $500k for LEIC. The president is committed to helping to increase our funding again next year.

Salary plan – The new UT salary schedules were effective July 1.  They are posted on the UT HR web site at 
http://humanresources.tennessee.edu/compensation/schedules/index.html.  A condensed version with IPS-specific information is also posted on our intranet site at:
http://intranet.ips.tennessee.edu/2010_budget.asp. We will use these to set IPS target salaries using our standard ten-point scale for all staff.
 
We are distributing a 3.0% salary pool
  • 1.5% is across the board to every employee with a $750 minimum increase. 
  • A 1% pool is being distributed for market and internal equity as we continue to move all staff toward their target salary. 95.5% of all staff will be at or above target after these increases.
  • A .5% pool is being distributed as one-time bonuses for merit, based on annual performance reviews that recognize our highest performing employees. These employees will receive $1400, $1000 or some percentage thereof based on percent time worked.
Every employee will receive a letter, hopefully before the end of July, indicating their new base salary.
 
Lots of great things are happening across the Institute. Thanks to all the great staff who represent the University so well to our customers.

Wednesday, October 10, 2012

Employee Engagement Survey - Open Response Analysis


You will recall that last fall the UT System conducted an Employee Engagement Survey. We are improving our work environment by analyzing the results and implementing improvements. at the agency level as well as institute-wide. This week I received a summary of the responses to the three open-ended questions at the end of the survey. I will post the full report on the Intranet site (it includes graphs and charts). Below is a summary of the findings.

Open Response Analysis

Institute for Public Service

Employee Engagement Survey

November 1 – 18, 2011

 

1.      What do you appreciate most about working at this institute?


·        The public service mission of IPS and the individual agencies

·        The belief the work enables employees to make a positive contribution to the community

·        The affiliation with the University of Tennessee

·        Appreciation for colleagues and the camaraderie within their departments

·        Appreciation for the flexibility and autonomy they are afforded



2.      What would make this institute a better place to work?
 

·        A greater sense of accountability and consistency in the application of policies

·        Stronger sense of alignment and trust across agencies and with IPS as a whole

·       Better communication, especially regarding “the big picture” and appropriate transparency

·        Enhanced consistency and leadership from those in leadership/supervisory roles

·        Improvements to compensation, benefits and IPS/Agency funding

 

3.      What are the top three things you think could be done to strengthen the culture of the institute?

·        Accountability

o   Consistent application of policies

o   Provide recognition to those who deserve it

o   Address problems/issues in a timely and constructive manner

·        Communication

o   Improve communication in general, especially from leadership

o   Include employees in decisions that impact them

o   Enhance communication across agencies

·        Cultivate a better sense of understanding of, and appreciation for, the work of the various agencies

·        Continue support of professional development

·        Consistency in funding and improvements to compensation

 

Wednesday, May 23, 2012

Senior Leadership

This is the last post in a series of articles on the categorical results of the Employee Engagement Survey. One of the categories evaluated in the Employee Engagement Survey is called "Senior Leadership." As defined by the survey instrument, senior leadership includes agency directors (Garland, Green, Jennings, and Thompson), assistant vice presidents (Shoopman and Tallent) and the vice president (Jinks).  The questions that address this issue include:

* Senior leadership provides a clear direction for this institute's future. (40%)
* Our senior leadership has the knowledge, skills and experience necessary for our success. (54%)
* Senior leadership shows a genuine interest in the well-being of administration and staff. (45%)
* Senior leadership communicates openly about important matters. (40%)
* Senior leadership regularly models this institute's values. (53%)
* I believe what I am told by senior leadership. (41%)

The number in parentheses indicates the percent of respondents who either agreed or strongly agreed with this statement. The overall score in this category was 45% positive and 26% negative.

Employees who were most satisfied in this area are either those who (1) are 60-64 year of age, (2) have been here less than two years, or (3) expect to stay 6-9 years.

The Employee Relations Committee and the HR Strategy Team will be analyzing the data further to determine specific things we can do to improve policies, resources and efficiency.

What suggestions do you have?

Border Photo

Institute for Public Service
105 Student Services Building
Knoxville, TN 37996
Phone: (865) 974-6621